President NRDS
I feel immense Pride & Pleasure to introduce you SCET which is my dream project. It has the potential to become center of Excellence in engineering studies with its sprawling campus, world-class infrastructure, excellent faculty and study-conducive serene environment for a student. I invite you all to explore the future prospects of your wards at our institute of meaningful learning with a conscience.
Principal
In the knowledge era of technology, dynamic changes are taking place. To meet challenges, for sustenance and appreciable growth, the organizations need the manpower who will be their greatest asset for policy making, execution, maintenance of the project. At SCET it is our commitment to provide high-quality engineering education which will be backed by industrial exposure, requisite value added courses, teaching methods.
Secretary
The secretary Mr. Ranjeet D. Chafle M.B.A., Who is young and dynamic personality. He is distinguished, dedicated and determined academician for being instrumental in established educational institutions, Nagpur region. Our aims are to equip students to think and act critically, to be creative in their responses. At the same time, we here at SCET want students to be perceptive and supportive of the world around them.
There’s nothing more I believe strongly than getting young students interested in engineering for a better tomorrow. The future belongs to those who believe in the capabilities of young minds. At Suryodaya College of Engineering Technology, all our endeavors of achieving academic excellence are driven by the goal of creating a solid edifice for a brilliant future of our youth.
Key Indicator | Extended Profile | |||||||||
1.1 | Number of students year wise during last five years | |||||||||
2.1 | Number of full time teachers during last five years | |||||||||
3.1 | Expenditures excluding salary component year wise during last five years |
Key Indicator | Criterion7–Institutional Values and Best Practices | 100 | ||||||||
7.1 | Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities | 50 | ||||||||
7.2 | Best Practices | 30 | ||||||||
7.3 | Institutional Distinctiveness | 20 |
Key Indicator | Criterion 6- Governance, Leadership and Management | 100 | ||||||
6.1 | Institutional Vision and Leadership | 10 | ||||||
6.2 | Strategy Development and Deployment | 10 | ||||||
6.3 | Faculty Empowerment Strategies | 35 | ||||||
6.4 | Financial Management and Resource Mobilization | 15 | ||||||
6.5 | Internal Quality Assurance System | 30 |
Key Indicator | Criterion 5- Student Support and Progression | 140 | ||||||
5.1 | Student Support | 50 | ||||||
5.2 | Student Progression | 30 | ||||||
5.3 | Student Participation and Activities | 50 | ||||||
5.4 | Alumni Engagement | 10 |
Key Indicator | Criterion 4 – Infrastructure and Learning Resources | 100 | ||||||||
4.1 | Physical Facilities | 30 | ||||||||
4.2 | Library as a learning Resource | 20 | ||||||||
4.3 | IT Infrastructure | 30 | ||||||||
4.4 | Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure | 20 |
Key Indicator | Criteria 3- Research, Innovations and Extension | 110 | ||||||
3.1 | Resource Mobilization for Research | 10 | ||||||
3.2 | Innovation Ecosystem | 15 | ||||||
3.3 | Research Publication and Awards | 25 | ||||||
3.4 | Extension Activities | 40 | ||||||
3.5 | Collaboration | 20 |
Key Indicator | Criteria 2- Teaching- Learning and Evaluation | 350 | |||||||
2.1 | Student Enrolment and Profile | 40 | |||||||
2.2 | Student Teacher Ratio | 40 | |||||||
2.3 | Teaching- Learning Process | 40 | |||||||
2.4 | Teacher Profile and Quality | 40 | |||||||
2.5 | Evaluation Process and Reforms | 40 | |||||||
2.6 | Student Performance and Learning Outcome | 90 | |||||||
2.7 | Student Satisfaction Survey | 60 |
Key Indicator | Criterion 1 – Curricular Aspects | 100 | ||||||
1.1 | Curricular Planning and Implementation | 20 | ||||||
1.2 | Academic Flexibility | 30 | ||||||
1.3 | Curriculum Enrichment | 30 | ||||||
1.4 | Feedback System | 20 |